[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
November 6, 1996

The Comparative Effect on Bone Density, Endometrium, and Lipids of Continuous Hormones as Replacement Therapy (CHART Study)A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author Affiliations

for the CHART Study Group
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Dr Speroff); Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Warner-Lambert Company, Ann Arbor, Mich (Drs Rowan and Symons); Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Genant); and the Structural Research Center, Mobile, Ala (Dr Wilborn).

JAMA. 1996;276(17):1397-1403. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540170041030

Objective.  —To compare the effect of continuous norethindrone acetate (NA)— ethinyl estradiol (EE2) combinations with matching unopposed EE2 or placebo.

Design.  —A 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial.

Setting.  —Outpatients at 65 centers.

Patients.  —Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women aged 40 years or older who had undergone the onset of spontaneous menopause within the last 5 years and who had an intact uterus.

Interventions.  —Patients were equally randomized to placebo or 1 of 8 treatment groups: 0.2 mg of NA and 1 μg of EE2; 0.5 mg of NA and 2.5 μg of EE2; 1 mg of NA and 5 μg of EE2; 1 mg of NA and 10 μg of EE2; 1 μg of EE2; 2.5 μg of EE2; 5 μg of EE2; or 10 μg of EE2.

Primary Outcome Measures.  —Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography, serum lipids, and endometrial effects as assessed by rate of hyperplasia and proliferative status.

Results.  —Twelve hundred sixty-five patients entered the study. Bone mineral density increased significantly from baseline (P<.001) in the 1 mg NA-5 μg EE2 and the 1 mg NA-10 μg EE2 treatment groups at each annual assessment. Among the unopposed EE2 groups, only the 10-μg group had increased BMD above baseline, but also was accompanied by an unacceptably high rate of endometrial hyperplasia. The NA-EE2 treatment groups had a significant linear dose-response trend for increasing BMD. Increased endometrial proliferation and hyperplasia occurred with increasing unopposed estrogen doses. The combination of NA and EE2 effectively protected the endometrium against hyperplasia. The percentage of change in the ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was positive for all treatment groups. The increase in triglyceride levels associated with EE2 was attenuated with NA-EE2 treatment.

Conclusions.  —Daily treatment with NA-EE2 was well tolerated and protected the endometrium from EE2-induced proliferation and hyperplasia. The NA-EE2 treatments produced a dose-related significant increase in BMD that was not present with unopposed EE2treatment. The overall effect of NA-EE2 treatments on lipid measures was favorable.