[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.151.77. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 4, 1996

Comparison of the 'Open' vs 'Closed' Intensive Care Unit Formats

Author Affiliations

University of South Wales Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

JAMA. 1996;276(21):1720-1721. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540210028018
Abstract

To the Editor.  —Carson et al1 claim to have demonstrated an improvement in outcome in critically ill medical patients managed in a closed ICU compared with those managed in an open unit. However, what is essentially a political position (and one that I also hold) is not supported by their results.The samples of patients studied (124 in the open period, 121 in the closed period) were too small to compare standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) in any meaningful way (SMR, 0.90 and 0.78, respectively; no confidence intervals [CIs] given). Moreover, the investigators provide no evidence that the APACHE II system "calibrated" in their unit (ie, there was a linear relationship between observed and expected mortality across the entire range of risk) and also "discriminated" between survivors and patients who died (ie, gave an area of >80% under a receiver operating characteristic curve). Neither of these seems likely given the small numbers of

×