[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.171.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1, 1997

Occupation and Disease: How Social Factors Affect the Conception of Work-Related Disorders

Author Affiliations

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City

 

by Allard E. Dembe, 344 pp, with illus, $37.50, ISBN 0-300-06436-5, New Haven, Conn, Yale University Press, 1996

JAMA. 1997;277(1):84-85. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540250092048

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

It is Allard Dembe's contention that physicians are influenced by a wide variety of social factors in considering certain conditions to be occupational diseases. Based on his review of research and available empirical data, Professor Dembe has identified 12 factors that are particularly relevant to understanding how occupational disorders are initially recognized and conceived: new technologies, legal determinants of financial compensation, labor activism, economic instability, public reactions, cultural stereotyping, medical specialization, mass media attention, profit motive of vendors selling prevention and treatment devices, military conflict consequences, political benefit from supporting control of health problems, and high costs for control technology reducing the likelihood of medical recognition of a problem, as there is little chance of amelioration.

One of the author's primary objectives is to characterize these factors, describing their complexity and interrelationships as they apply to particular disorders. To make his point, Dembe selects three controversial work-related disorders: cumulative trauma

×