[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 8, 1997

Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization: Time for a Randomized Trial

Author Affiliations

University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Virginia Charlottesville
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minn

JAMA. 1997;277(2):111-112. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540260025022
Abstract

To the Editor.  —As the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists, the largest American subspecialty group of anesthesiologists and intensivists, we write to raise several points about the recent article by Dr Connors and colleagues on the RHC1 and its accompanying Editorial.2We commend Connors et al for their attempt to examine the efficacy and safety of the RHC in a large cohort of critically ill (medical) patients. Their finding that the use of the RHC "was associated with an increased risk of mortality" certainly warrants further investigation. The explanations proposed by the authors are interesting, raising the possibility that the aggressive, interventional style of management practiced in some ICUs is hazardous rather than beneficial.An alternative explanation, that the "benefits of RHC may not be realized if the physician interpreting the output of the catheter is not knowledgeable and skilled in its

×