[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.121.0. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 17, 1997

Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the Use of Radiography in Acute Knee Injuries

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Emergency Medicine (Drs Stiell, Sivilotti, Cwinn, Greenberg, and Michael), the Department of Medicine (Drs Wells and Nichol), the Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine (Dr McDowell), and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit (Ms Cacciotti), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; the Department of Emergency Medicine (Dr Hoag), Queensway-Carleton Hospital, Nepean, Ontario; the Division of Emergency Medicine (Dr Verbeek), Universityof Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; the Department of Emergency Medicine (Dr Greenway), Peel Memorial Hospital, Brampton, Ontario.

JAMA. 1997;278(23):2075-2079. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550230051036
Abstract

Context.  —The Ottawa Knee Rule is a previously validated clinical decision rule that was developed to allow physicians to be more selective and efficient in their use of plain radiography for patients with acute knee injuries.

Objective.  —To assess the impact on clinical practice of implementing the Ottawa Knee Rule.

Design.  —Controlled clinical trial with before-after and concurrent controls.

Setting.  —Emergency departments of 2 teaching and 2 community hospitals.

Patients.  —All 3907 consecutive eligible adults seen with acute knee injuries during two 12-month periods before and after the intervention.

Intervention.  —During the after period in the 2 intervention hospitals, the Ottawa Knee Rule was taught to all house staff and attending physicians who were encouraged to order knee radiography according to the rule.

Main Outcome Measures.  —Referral for knee radiography, accuracy and reliability of the rule, mean time in emergency department, and mean charges.

Results.  —There was a relative reduction of 26.4% in the proportion of patients referred for knee radiography in the intervention group (77.6% vs 57.1%; P<.001), but a relative reduction of only 1.3% in the control group (76.9% vs 75.9%; P=.60). These changes over time were significant when the intervention and control groups were compared (P<.001). The rule was found to have a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.94-1.0) for detecting 58 knee fractures. The κ coefficient for interpretation of the rule was 0.91 (95% Cl, 0.82-1.0). Compared with nonfracture patients who underwent radiography during the after-intervention period, those discharged without radiography spent less time in the emergency department (85.7 minutes vs 118.8 minutes) and incurred lower estimated total medical charges for physician visits and radiography (US $80 vs US $183).

Conclusions.  —Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule led to a decrease in use of knee radiography without patient dissatisfaction or missed fractures and was associated with reduced waiting times and costs. Widespread use of the rule could lead to important health care savings without jeopardizing patient care.

×