[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 13, 1912

Chloroform as an Anesthetic: A Protest Against the Report of the Committee on Anesthesia

Author Affiliations

Corpus Christi, Texas.

JAMA. 1912;LIX(2):135. doi:10.1001/jama.1912.04270070136024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —The conclusion of the Committee on Anesthesia that the use of chloroform is no longer justifiable in major operations (The Journal, June 15, 1912, p. 1909), is so extreme that I wonder at finding no protest. If this conclusion is to stand unchallenged, it follows that thousands of surgeons (mostly of the south) will be obliged to give up their favorite anesthetic; not always because they agree with the committee, but because they fear censure or suit for malpractice in the event of a fatality. Chloroform is used in Texas more than ten times as much as ether, and I feel sure that the same ratio exists in many other southern states. I feel sure that there are in Texas more than one hundred surgeons, whose experience would duplicate my own, viz., more than one thousand administrations of chloroform without a death.

Induced Pneumothorax in Treatment of 

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×