[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.128.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 22, 1890

THE NATURE OF TETANUS.

JAMA. 1890;XIV(12):419-420. doi:10.1001/jama.1890.02410120023003

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

For a great many years the epidemic and contagious nature of tetanus has been asserted by various medical and surgical writers, and their observations in the light of recent experiment is interesting. Larry, Thierry and Hutin recorded many outbreaks of this terrible disease after the Napoleonic battles, and Murat in a thesis published in 1816 reports an epidemic of tetanus following the battle of Jena, to which the wounded who had sought shelter in the churches and churchyards (localities in Europe serving as burying-places), it may be recalled, were especially liable. In 1854 Simson, and 1855 Benjamin Travers, of Edinburg, asserted that tetanus was infectious; a statement affirmed by Vulpian in 1866, and reaffirmed by Trelat after his experience in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-71.

Acting upon the similarity of tetanus and hydrophobia and following the example of Pasteur, Nocart, in 1882 tried in vain to inoculate the the disease

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×