[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 28, 1888

HUMANITY IN THE DEATH SENTENCE.

JAMA. 1888;X(4):114-115. doi:10.1001/jama.1888.02400300018004

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

It is now about a year since a State Commission was appointed in New York, to investigate and report on the most humane and practical method of carrying into effect the sentence of death. That Commission, of which Mr. Elbridge T. Gerry, President of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, was chairman, has completed its work and has just presented to the State Legislature its report, a pamphlet of almost a hundred pages, that bears witness to the commendable zeal and industry of the Commissioners. Of the methods now in use among civilized peoples for executing criminals not one can be called humane and practical. The principal devices for this purpose are the guillotine, the garrote, and the gallows. The first two are practical but not humane, while the gallows is neither humane nor practical.

Inasmuch as it has been pretty thoroughly shown by experiment

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×