[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.119.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 5, 1914

COMMON ERRORS IN GALL-TRACT SURGERY

Author Affiliations

DES MOINES, IOWA

JAMA. 1914;LXIII(10):832-839. doi:10.1001/jama.1914.02570100018006

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

An operative technic which gives a low mortality may be far from perfection, especially when relief is not obtained by the patient from the trouble for which the operation was done, or when other calamities must be endured by the patient which are a direct result of the operation.

In no class of operative procedures for non-malignant conditions are secondary operations required in so large a percentage as in those done on the gall-tracts. In no class of abdominal work is the temptation greater for inefficient or incomplete work, and in none is complete work more difficult than that encountered in many of these cases. Stones in the common duct, at or near the lower end, are found and removed successfully by only a very few operators. The amateur aspirant to surgical honors and perquisites can safely drain a large readily accessible gall-bladder, and if perchance he find a stone,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×