This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—In your issue of December 16 you reter to a certain, or rather, uncertain "dealer in rugs" as having been called a swindler by the Tribune. Why this "better part of valor" in discreetly suppressing the details? The Tribune evidently had courage enough to expose a fraud and take a chance. Full publicity of such cases is for the good and protection of the community and a further deterrent to evil. In some countries the convicted party must publish the decision of the court in a number of papers. Now, if it was a libel suit The Journal feared, it could have limited itself to a citation of the case from the records, giving the name of plaintiff and defendant, as it does in its medicolegal column. No accusation could possibly lie on the publication of a finding of a court, and your readers would know, as
F. PH. "Another 'Contemptuous Verdict'". JAMA. 1917;LXVIII(2):137. doi:10.1001/jama.1917.04270010137025