[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 11, 1903

Protracted Anesthesia.

JAMA. 1903;XLI(2):116. doi:10.1001/jama.1903.04470040044028

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Amesbury, Mass., June 28, 1903.

To the Editor:—The subject embraced in the above title is one that I have not seen discussed in medical journals. I have no desire to act the part of the carping critic in considering modern methods of surgery; I am quite ready to acknowledge the wonderful progress made by the masters of the knife in the last forty years. To an old-time military surgeon the present results in treatment of wounds seem little less than a miracle. I have spent many hours removing maggots from suppurating stumps after operations, so that the dry antiseptic dressing seems like a page from a fairy tale.

The old-time surgeon had certain qualifications for which he should be given credit. He was a rapid operator. Prior to ether and chloroform the length of time required for an operation weighed heavily in the scale of results. Shock was rated

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview