[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.149.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 29, 1903

THE RURAL LABORATORY.

JAMA. 1903;XLI(9):562. doi:10.1001/jama.1903.02490280032008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Last week we called attention to the practical value of blood examination, and its great importance as a means of diagnosis and to the simplicity of its technic.

But valuable as is this method and simple as is the technic, it yet requires not alone a training in bacteriology, but apparatus, media, etc., that must constantly be on hand and ready at all times to be brought into use. In larger cities with their medical colleges, hospitals and municipal laboratories there is comparatively little difficulty in finding the man and the appliances close at hand. But what about the "country doctor" and physicians in small towns? How can they, however much they may desire it, make their early diagnosis of typhoid or of pneumococcus bacteriemia by the blood examination? It is well-nigh impossible for the average physician in the smaller town, or in the city for that matter, even though

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×