[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.141.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 17, 1896

SEPSIS OF THE NEWBORN.

Author Affiliations

Member of the Kentucky State Medical Society; Clinical Assistant to the Chair of Practice and Instructor in Physical Diagnosis in the Kentucky School of Medicine, Louisville: Visiting Physician to the Masonic Widows' and Orphans' Home: Associate Editor and Manager Mathews' Medical Quarterly, etc. LOUISVILLE, KY.

JAMA. 1896;XXVII(16):835-837. doi:10.1001/jama.1896.02430940005001a

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The history of the following case is reported as the text for a few remarks upon sepsis in the newborn, not only because of its rarity, but because of the interest attached to the case in connection with its etiology.

Baby T. was born on February 1, 1896, of a healthy primiparous mother after a normal though rather tedious labor which had to be terminated by forceps. The child was a male weighing about seven pounds, cried well and was quite vigorous.

The mother had no vaginal discharge before labor, but a vaginal douche of 1-2,000 bichlorid of mercury was given her upon the advent of the first pain, none were given afterward. Her puerperium was perfectly normal and afebrile.

As soon as the head was born the eyes were wiped and the face was washed, the first bath being given some hours later. The cord was tied with a

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×