[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 10, 1903

THE NOMENCLATURE OF TOXINS.

JAMA. 1903;XLI(15):912-913. doi:10.1001/jama.1903.02490340020006

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Bacterial and other toxins have proved to be of so complex a nature and subject to such alterations that a group of terms relating to them has developed. These terms are not devoid of confusion, owing to their multiplicity and similarity. The word toxin has come to have a limited and technical application. Ehrlich has concluded that it should be applied to those poisonous products of vegetable or animal metabolism by immunization with which one is able to obtain a specific antitoxin. Diphtheria and tetanus toxin, abrin, ricin, etc., are examples of the former, and snake poison of the latter. Toxins must also have a definite structure, that is to say, a haptophorous group by which they link themselves to cells and substances derived from cells, especially antitoxin, and a toxophorous group. This definition, then, excludes such poisonous substances as the vegetable alkaloids, as strychnin and morphin, and poisonous minerals,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×