[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 24, 1914

THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHOLELITHIASIS FROM GASTRIC AND DUODENAL ULCER

Author Affiliations

Instructor in Medicine in the George Washington University, Department of Medicine, and Attending Physician to the Outpatient Department of the University Hospital WASHINGTON, D. C.

JAMA. 1914;LXII(4):263-265. doi:10.1001/jama.1914.02560290013004

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The statement so frequently made that gall-stones, in a large percentage of cases, produce no symptoms, is misleading and requires some qualification. It is true that they are often found during operation or post mortem when their presence has not been suspected, but in most cases symptoms were present, and were attribuuted to disease of some organ other than the gall-bladder, usually the stomach or duodenum and sometimes the appendix.

Recognition of this fact has induced some authors to group cases in two classes: (1) those giving direct symptoms, unmistakably indicating gall-bladder disease; (2) the group presenting indirect symptoms referred to other organs. It is to the group presenting symptoms of uncertain meaning that attention is invited, because it is in this class that difficulty is especially apt to be encountered in establishing a correct diagnosis.

A brief reference to the embryology and physiology of the organs involved may explain

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×