[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
December 5, 1903


JAMA. 1903;XLI(23):1417. doi:10.1001/jama.1903.02490420038010

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


A society for the prevention of cruelty to children is much needed in Ohio. In ik.cl state, human sacrifices in the name of religion are apparently authorized by law. A man allowed his 8-year-old daughter, who had been badly burned, to die without medical treatment, save that administered by Eddyites, and we know what that means. The grand jury naturally indicted the parents for manslaughter. In the trial the judge charged the jury to bring in a verdict of acquittal on the ground that no law existed in Ohio under which the parents could be prosecuted. The jury did so and the Supreme Court, to which the case was carried, ruled that the charge and the verdict were without error. It would seem that the State of Ohio is in bad shape as regards its laws protecting infant life; legislation in this regard is one of the present needs of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview