[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
May 14, 1904


JAMA. 1904;XLII(20):1294. doi:10.1001/jama.1904.02490650032011

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The mayor of Greater New York has exercised his prerogative in vetoing the Elsberg bill abolishing the coroner in that city. He objects to an innovation on a time-honored system, and claims that an institution which is the growth of a thousand years should not be destroyed unless it is proven that its substitute is more useful and will stand the test of time as well. There is a little fallacy in this that the mayor does not seem to want to recognize. His remarks would apply to any time-honored abuse that has been kept up through interested motives from time immemorial. The fact, moreover, that the medical examiner's plan is working satisfactorily, except, perhaps, to the politicians, in other states and cities is ignored. We have held a rather high opinion of Mayor McClellan's intelligence, and the belief to which we are forced is that his veto of the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview