[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.66.254. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 6, 1906

MEDICAL FALLACIES.

JAMA. 1906;XLVII(14):1104. doi:10.1001/jama.1906.02520140040014

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In the last number of the American Magazine is an article on popular medical fallacies by Dr. L. K. Hirshberg which, while rather nihilistic in tone, is, on the whole, commendable. A number of popularly accepted propositions with regard to medical matters are directly contradicted. Virchow used to say that all of the medical fallacies accepted generally by the people have been at one time doctrines recognized by physicians. Undoubtedly many of the present-day popular medical fallacies even yet are accepted by certain physicians, and it is this that helps to keep them alive. For instance, there are still physicians who say that boils are always a manifestation of a blood disease. While it is true that a rundown condition will predispose to the appearance of boils, these are practically always due to infection from without. It is suggested that men suffer more from boils on the neck than do

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×