[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 30, 1896

Proper Title of a Medical Officer of the Army.

JAMA. 1896;XXVI(22):1086-1087. doi:10.1001/jama.1896.02430740038011

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Groveland, Mass., May 4, 1896.

To the Editor:  —I notice in the Journal of February 1 an article entitled " Some Remarks about Asepsis in Military Service," read, etc., by Lieut.-Col. —.At first one would wonder what a military m an might know about asepsis, and although there is little of professional instruction contained in the paper, I infer that this Lieut.-Col. for some reason or other ignores his professional title. This craze makes me tired, Doctor. Time was when the honorable title of doctor would be considered an honor for a prince. In point of fact, there is to-day no more honorable title, and no good reason why physicians who respect their profession should be willing to exchange it for a complimentary military title.I send you a communication received recently from the Secretary of War. For the sake of the profession and to put a damper on bombast

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×