This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Chicago, Nov. 28, 1906.
To the Editor:
—Dr. David L. Edsall's article in The Journal, Nov. 3, 1906, so overstates, in my opinion, the dangers from x-ray exposures that it should not go without reply. Dr. Edsall's article begins with several paragraphs devoted to an implied criticism at the tardiness of the recognition of deep-seated effects of x-rays and at the purely empirical use of x-rays as a therapeutic agent His opening sentence is: "In its relation to medical practice, one of the most remarkable things about the x-ray is the tardiness with which there was any realization of its power of producing very marked changes in other tissues than those superficially situated. "X-rays were discovered November, 1895. To cite no other illustration, as long ago as the summer of 1897, W. Stone Scott reviewed the cases in which deep-seated effects were thought to have occurred from x-rays without corresponding
Pusey WA. The Danger of X-Ray Exposures.. JAMA. 1906;XLVII(23):1932-1933. doi:10.1001/jama.1906.02520230068014