[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 23, 1907

LET THE PRESCRIBER KNOW.

JAMA. 1907;XLVIII(12):1035. doi:10.1001/jama.1907.02520380051011

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The specious argument has been advanced by the nostrum defenders that if the ingredients of "patent medicines" must be declared to the laity the prescriptions of physicians should also be given in English so that the patient may know what he is taking. This is a most ingenious sophistry. The medical profession has never suggested that "patent medicines" should be labeled so that the patient may know what he is taking. The whole basis of this agitation against secrecy is that the prescriber must know what he is giving. When a person employs a physician the latter is the prescriber, and he should know the composition of every medicine he uses; but if this person prescribes for himself he is the prescriber and should know what he prescribes. Now, if a physician's prescription is to be passed about among the laity we agree that it should have the English equivalents

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×