[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 15, 1904

HOW THE FRENCH REGARD SURGICAL CARELESSNESS.

JAMA. 1904;XLIII(16):1150. doi:10.1001/jama.1904.02500160052009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

A distinguished Paris surgeon is reported, according to the cable dispatches, to be under indictment for homicide, because he inadvertently, it is presumed, left a portion of a broken instrument in the patient's abdomen after an operation. There are many surgeons who have had a like experience, so far as the accident goes, but this is the first case in which we have heard of a criminal indictment following such an event. Civil suits are not unknown. If the French law is such as to make such oversights criminal carelessness, it will be a special inducement to greater care against the occurrence. Of course, conviction in such a case is by no means a certainty. There are others beside the surgeon who should share or take the responsibility. The engrossing nature of a capital operation, requiring almost every faculty to be at special attention to the operative details, and the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×