Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
February 28, 1891

Absence of Uterus.

JAMA. 1891;XVI(9):323. doi:10.1001/jama.1891.02410610035019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:  —The interesting case reported in No. 8 of The Journal by Dr. McShane, of Carmel, Ind., recalls to mind a case I had a few years since. A lady, aged 24 years, consulted me to ascertain why she could not have children. She had been married six years, was well developed, not masculine; breasts were normal, the pudendum normal, and well covered with hair.I found by digital examination a good-sized vagina, but no cervix uteri; in fact, there was nothing but a smooth, well arched vagina, about 4 inches in depth. I introduced a sound into the bladder, and with my finger in the rectum I could readily feel the sound, showing that there was complete absence of the uterus.Having been a member of the Association for several years, I think it best to let well enough alone and publish The Journal at Chicago.Oneida,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview