[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.158.163. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 29, 1900

ABDOMINAL VS. VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR UTERINE CARCINOMA.

Author Affiliations

SURGEON-IN-CHIEF OF THE GERMAN HOSPITAL. PHILADELPHIA.

JAMA. 1900;XXXV(13):786-788. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.24620390002001a
Abstract

The choice of route for hysterectomy must be selected for each case. It is my desire to present a concise résumé of the reasons for each, and the advantages they offer in the cases to which they are applicable.

The views laid down are those of the general surgeon, and are based on an experience in this work that justifies, I think, an opinion. It has been claimed that vaginal hysterectomy is an operation that requires special training and attention to detail and technique which can only be acquired by the specialist. I can not, however, allow this statement to go unchallenged, for I believe that the general surgeon, with his larger field and constant application to detailed technique, is equally well, if not better, equipped to perform every operation of gynecology than is the specialist himself.

Who to-day, but in exceptional instances, would dream of amputating a carcinomatous mammary

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×