[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
November 10, 1900


JAMA. 1900;XXXV(19):1222. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.02460450038013

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


As noted elsewhere in The Journal, the medical profession in Virginia is up in arms against the unrighteous license law of that state. Why physicians should have to submit to such a tax is incomprehensible, according to any rules of justice and decency. The state might as well specially tax clergymen—we are not sure that it does not, for a legislature that would do one thing would not be above doing the other. Any intelligent individual can see that the utility of the average practitioner of medicine to the state is enough to warrant giving him special consideration instead of adding to his burdens, but the Virginia legislators seem to have been too obtuse even for this. If the medical men of the state use the influence they possess, it would seem that the repeal of the law would be a certainty, and if there is the least difficulty it

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview