[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 174.129.66.66. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 19, 1892

IDIOSYNCRASY.

JAMA. 1892;XVIII(12):357. doi:10.1001/jama.1892.02411160015002

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In the last number of his Archives of Surgery, Mr. Jonathan Hutchinson has a brief note respecting this subject. There is a want of agreement, he holds, in the minds and in the expressions of different writers as to the importance, medically speaking, of idiosyncrasy. In no other way could he understand some of the literary allusions that have lately come under his notice. For example, he has seen in a recent review of the literature of anæsthetics a statement, made with great emphasis, to the effect that no one now thinks of adducing as a means of explaining the fatal cases. " I may confess," he says, " that to my own mind it still looms out as by far the foremost of the agencies at work." Without doubt, there are other very important factors; no doubt there are different degrees of risk attaching to the different drugs used; no doubt

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×