[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.112.64. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 22, 1900

PROFESSIONAL SECRECY AND CRIMINALS.

JAMA. 1900;XXXV(25):1634. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.02460510042009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

According to a newspaper report. a Chicago physician is supposed to know the whereabouts of the principal in a recent murder case and refuses to give any information on the ground that he is bound to protect his patient by the ethics of his profession. In commenting on this supposed fact, the newspaper assumes that the medical profession has set up such a rule as would require physicians to conceal criminals, and says: "Too often fugitives from justice are aided in their attempts to escape by doctors who are over-zealous in their observation of so-called professional ethics. It is time for the medical profession to define clearly where it stands on this important matter." There is a serious misapprehension of facts in the above quotation. Medical secrecy does not demand anything of the physician that would make him an accessory after the fact in a criminal case. Physicians are not

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×