[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.141.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 16, 1901

THE GERM OF SMALLPOX.

JAMA. 1901;XXXVI(11):743-744. doi:10.1001/jama.1901.02470110045011

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The germ of smallpox has heretofore received no general recognition, though the conviction that variola is a germ disease is unavoidable. The latest on this subject is to be found in the British Medical Journal for February 23, in which are two communications bearing on this subject. Dr. M. Funck, director of the Institut Sérothérapique, and chief of the bacteriologic laboratory of the University of Brussels, reports the results of his studies in this direction and the finding. in vaccin and smallpox pustules, of morphologically identical organisms which he considers as the cause of vaccinia and variola. These appear under three forms, representing different stages of the same protozoon: 1, an isolated green sphere showing slow movements; 2, the same infecting epidermic cells, and 3, a morula form consisting of agglomerated sporoblasts; the last is the one most frequently found in old vaccins, while the first form is more common

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×