[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
October 1, 1898


Author Affiliations

Late Ophthalmologist to the Chair of Neurology and Chief Clinical Assistant in Ophthalmology and Otology in the Medical Department of the University of Colorado; Ophthalmologist and Otologist to the House of the Good Shepherd; Oculist and Aurist to the C., R. I. & P. Ry. DENVER, COLO.

JAMA. 1898;XXXI(14):777-780. doi:10.1001/jama.1898.92450140031001n

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


That regular astigmatism of the cornea is not always congenital, is clearly stated in some of our standard text-books on ophthalmology. Noyes (2d rev. ed., p. 111) states that "some rare cases of regular corneal astigmatism are acquired, but as a rule the affection is congenital." Schmidt-Rimpler (3d ed. p. 84) believes: "as a rule the affection is congenital." Berry (2d ed., p. 543) says of astigmatism: "The cause is mostly a difference in the curvature of different meridians of the cornea, a difference which may be congenital or acquired."

Hartridge (Refraction of the Eye, p. 122) expresses the view: "astigmatism is usually congenital, but may be acquired, and frequently there is some hereditary tendency." Henderson (Annals of Ophthalmology and Otology, Vol. v, p. 523) has reported one case of acquired regular corneal astigmatism. The literature bearing on acquired regular corneal astigmatism is certainly very limited. To be convinced that

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview