[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 17, 1900

QUACKERY, EXPECTORATION, AND THE LAW.

JAMA. 1900;XXXIV(7):435. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.02460070051008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

An Alabama judge has given out the decision that the right to expectorate is inherent, and unless special receptacles are provided no penalty can accrue from spitting on floors or sidewalks. Here is another obstacle to the antituberculosis crusade. The decision is, however, apparently a broad one, and may not prove a precedent in all regions. There are other possibilities of committing nuisances than spitting, which have just as good a claim to be considered an inherent right, and which, in our civilized communities, are prohibited in public, notwithstanding the inconvenience the prohibition may cause. It would seem that spitting is to be considered a special privilege, according to this Alabama jurist. If his decision is to stand and be followed elsewhere, public spittoons will have to become a prominent feature in the landscape and take up space in all public conveyances, at least if the expectorating ordinances are to

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×