[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
January 18, 1965

Danger in Cardioversion: Height of R and T Waves

Author Affiliations



JAMA. 1965;191(3):253-254. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03080030097023

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  The report by Rabbino, Likoff, and Dreifus on "Complications and Limitations of Direct-Current Countershock" (JAMA190:417 [Nov 2] 1964), and your editorial in the same issue, both regard the possibility that ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia may, in effect, be caused by direct-current countershock but fail to suggest that these complications may result from lapses in technique rather than from digitalis or as unexplained events.Most equipment for direct-current countershock uses the R wave as the point of reference for synchronization to deliberately minimize the likelihood of the discharge occurring at the vulnerable T wave area. It is apparently not well recognized that the machines are not actually able to distinguish R waves from any other wave form and that the discharge follows the highest wave in the cycle, assuming this will always be an R wave. It can readily be seen that there are many circumstances

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview