[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 22, 1965

The Myth of Otomycosis

Author Affiliations

Portland, Ore

JAMA. 1965;191(12):1033. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03080120067029

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  I appreciate Dr. Littell's comments on the otomycosis problem. I stated the following in the original communication: "The external auditory canal is a unique cul-de-sac lined by squamous epithelium. This pocket provides an ideal substrate for the growth of various saprophytic fungi which are incapable of producing disease. The most common is Aspergillus niger, which can grow in such profusion that a pure culture is grossly visible in the ear canal. Such growth does not provoke an inflammatory response."The point of disagreement here is not involvement of the pinna, but whether or not the presence of Aspergillus in the canal can be regarded as infection. Pathogenic fungi which inhabit and invade tissue cause an inflammatory tissue reaction. A niger is a saprophyte which does not invade tissue, but grows as an opportunist in the "test tube" environment of the ear canal. The watery discharge which may

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×