[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.74.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 2, 1965

The Measles Rubella Confusion Continues

JAMA. 1965;193(5):403. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03090050079032

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  In the George X. Trimble, MD, "Critique and Cavil" (JAMA192:645 [May 17] 1965) it is said that "Deliberate exposure to measles has been recommended on a number of occasions in the literature." I would wager that it was not recommended in any of the three articles to which reference is given. Rubella, sometimes with confusion called German measles, rose measles, bastard measles, has no virological or immunological connection to measles and usually no appreciable clinical resemblance. Also, I am confident no true "measles party" is ever planned, as was suggested in Dr. Trimble's last line.The lay press frequently confuses rubella with measles; the august JAMA should not make this mistake.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×