[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
March 14, 1966

Periodic Health Examination— How Effective?

JAMA. 1966;195(11):30-31. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03100110022009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The roster is familiar, if not monotonous, to nearly all physicians: history, physical examination, urinalysis, hemoglobin, chest x-ray, ECG, sigmoidoscopy, another test or two and possibly a bit of serendipity.

This standard health examination, with variations, is performed on uncounted thousands each year. The result is a vast, mostly unanalyzed jungle of data that holds potential answers to a most important question:

  • What effect does regular periodic health examination have on morbidity and mortality? The question itself includes another basic one:

  • What should be included in a health examination?

Such broad questions may only be answered by a series of more precise observations, such as those being ferreted out in the Periodic Health Examination Research Project, based at the University of Pennsylvania. It is supported by a grant from the US Public Health Service.

More than 21,000 persons who have undergone one or more health examinations at eight

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview