[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 28, 1966

Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Biostatistics, American Medical Association, Chicago. Mr. Karten is a medical student at the Chicago Medical School.

JAMA. 1966;195(13):1123-1128. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03100130097026
Abstract

Contributors of scientific communications to medical journals are responsible for the research designs of their studies, the applicability of the statistical tests used, and the validity of the conclusions drawn. This is the policy of many editorial boards. The contributors in many cases have had very little, if any, training in research methods. Some, before the investigation is begun, seek the advice of statisticians whose specialty is designing experiments so that valid conclusions may be drawn. In other instances the statistician is involved in each stage of the study. In most instances, however, research projects have not had the benefit of sound statistical advice.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of this lack of statistical planning and evaluation and to present a program that may be of some help in correcting the deficiency.

Material and Methods  From a list of 67 most frequently read medical journals,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×