[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
April 4, 1966


Author Affiliations

From the Department of Urology, Beth Israel Hospital, and the Harvard Medical School, Boston.

JAMA. 1966;196(1):85-87. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03100140139039

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The major event of the period under review is the publication of the second edition of Campbell's Urology (3 vols, Saunders, 1963, $90). So comprehensive and authoritative a work has an importance greater than the sum of its contents. As the only American encyclopedia on the subject, it plays a definitive role, and helps to define what urology is. T. W. Stamey's observations, in his book review of this second edition, deserve special notice. Stamey called for a "unitary approach" to the genitourinary system that would close the breach between "those physicians who deal with the area from the calyces to the urethral meatus (urologists) and those who know the urinary tract only from the capsule of the kidney to the calyces (internists and renal physiologists)." Had Stamey grounds to hope for a change? Had he perceived a new impulse?

With the development of renal transplantation and the surgery of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview