[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.48.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 11, 1966

Evaluating Scientific Presentations

JAMA. 1966;197(2):40. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03110020026014

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Scientific presentations of this month's American Medical Association Annual Convention again were evaluated by the physician audience.

Physician evaluation of scientific papers was initiated at the June 1965 AMA Annual Convention in New York City. The professional audience was offered the opportunity again at the AMA Clinical Meeting in Philadelphia in November and December.

Gilson Colby Engel, MD, Philadelphia, chairman of the AMA's Council on Postgraduate Programs, has explained:

"The AMA Board of Trustees and House of Delegates have charged the Council to carry out periodic evaluation of the programs of all sections at the Annual and Clinical conventions."

The evaluation is designed to determine primary medical specialty and major professional activity of those in the audience, Ralph De Forest, MD, director of the AMA Department of Postgraduate Programs, explained. Then it seeks to learn what they thought about the entire scientific program, each section's program, each session and each

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×