[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 18, 1966

Penicilloyl-Polylysine Skin-Test Reactions

Author Affiliations

Danville, Pa

JAMA. 1966;197(3):226. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03110030120052

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  At a time when the medical profession has been subject to criticism for alleged disregard of human safety in pursuing clinical investigation which appears to be more curious than sane, the report of Resnik and Shelley (196:740, 1966) relating to the production of anaphylaxis with the penicilloylpolylysine (PPL) skin test should not go without comment and criticism.Prior to the production of anaphylaxis in the reported subject they had satisfactorily demonstrated specific PPL sensitivity. I cannot imagine what was in the authors' minds when, following a systemic reaction to the PPL skin test, this test was repeated using more concentrated material. Certainly, on the basis of past experience with reactions of this type, one would have anticipated and predicted the more severe reaction (anaphylaxis) which occurred.The potential hazard of anaphylaxis had been pointed out by Drs. Ettinger and Kaye (New Eng J Med271:1105,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×