[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.239.251. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 5, 1966

Taylor's Principles and Practice of Medical Jurisprudence

Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

 

2 vol, edited by Keith Simpson, ed 12; 526, 615 pp, 79, 54 illus, $50, London: J. & A. Churchill, Ltd. (Boston: Little, Brown & Co.), 1965.

JAMA. 1966;198(10):1132. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03110230148050

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The standards of forensic medicine and of medical jurisprudence (the terms are not synonymous) are not genuinely tested by investigation of a natural death, but rather by what happens when someone in high place meets a violent end. Those standards are sometimes pitifully weak in this country.

It is unlikely that a comparable medicolegal weakness would occur in England, thanks, in part, to "Taylor," whose 12th, and centenary edition, appeared last year. As its title states, this is not a work in forensic pathology, although pages are devoted to aspects of that field, nor is it a treatise on criminology. It is, as the editor proudly remarks in the preface, "firmly established as the work of ultimate reference in Courts of Law," designed to assist legal officers and medicolegal officials in pursuit of their duties, with special reference to English customs, practice, regulations, and laws.

In its coverage, "Taylor" ranges

×