2 tables omitted
Having a regular source of medical care (i.e., a regular provider or site) is one of the strongest predictors of access to health-care services,1,2 which has been associated with greater use of preventive health services.3,4 This report summarizes state-specific data from the 1995 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and examines demographic factors associated with not having a regular source of medical care among adults in the 10 states for which this information was available. The findings indicate that certain demographic characteristics are associated with lack of a regular source of medical care.
The BRFSS is a state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged ≥18 years.5 The 1995 BRFSS collected information about source of medical care from 15,989 survey respondents in 10 states (Alaska, Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Virginia). Participants were asked, "Is there one particular clinic, health center, doctor's office, or other place that you usually go to if you are sick or need advice about your health?" Prevalence estimates were calculated for persons who reported not having a regular source of medical care, and the reasons given for not having a regular source of medical care were examined. Sample estimates were weighted to represent the civilian population of each state, and SUDAAN® (Software for the Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data) was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals.6 Response rates ranged from 61.6% in Illinois to 76.2% in Oklahoma7 (overall response rate: 68.4%).
State-specific estimates of persons who lacked a regular source of medical care ranged from 11.0% in Oklahoma to 20.4% in Arizona (median: 14.4%). Among men, the prevalence of not having a regular source of medical care ranged from 13.5% in Oklahoma and New Jersey to 25.1% in Alaska (median: 20.3%). Among women, the prevalence of not having a regular source of medical care was lower and ranged from 8.5% in Illinois and North Carolina to 16.2% in Arizona (median: 9.5%). In most states, both white and black adults were more likely than Hispanics to have a regular source of medical care.
In all states, as age increased, the likelihood of having a regular source of medical care also increased. The prevalence of not having a regular source of medical care was highest among persons aged 18-29 years (range: 16.6%-31.4%; median: 25.5%), and lowest among persons aged ≥65 years (range: 2.0%-10.2%; median: 4.1%). In all states except North Carolina, persons with annual household incomes <$15,000 were more likely to not have a regular source of medical care than those with incomes ≥$50,000.
Persons without health-care insurance were more likely to not have a regular source of care than those who did have health-care coverage. Among persons who were uninsured, the prevalence of not having a regular source of medical care ranged from 24.7% in Louisiana to 55.4% in Arizona (median: 34.7%); and for those who were insured, from 6.6% in Oklahoma to 14.8% in Virginia (median: 12.0%).
When persons who did not have a regular source of health care were asked why, most (43.2%) reported that they did not need a doctor (range: 38.5% in New Jersey to 55.2% in Mississippi). More than 18% reported that they either had no health-care insurance or could not afford to visit a doctor.
P Owen, Alaska; B Bender, Arizona; B Steiner, MS, Illinois; M Perry, Kansas; R Meriwether, MD, Louisiana; P Arbuthnot, Mississippi; G Boeselager, MS, New Jersey; K Passaro, PhD, North Carolina; N Hann, MPH, Oklahoma; L Redman, Virginia. S Bland, MS, TRW Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. Behavioral Surveillance Br, Div of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
The findings in this report indicate that persons without a regular source of medical care are more likely to be young, male, Hispanic, and uninsured and to have a low household income. Most persons who did not have a regular source of medical care did not think they needed a regular source. The results suggest the need for education about the health benefits of having a primary source of medical care, including early identification of health problems and increased access to and use of preventive health services. In addition, the results provided information about factors, such as lack of health-care coverage and cost considerations, that might prevent access to preventive care and other appropriate health services.
The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, because households without telephones were not surveyed, the findings might underrepresent persons who have less education, have a lower annual household income, or are unemployed—all of which have been associated with increased likelihood of not having a regular source of health care.8 Second, because the estimates were based on self-reported data, they may be subject to recall bias.
Having a regular source of medical care is one of the strongest predictors of access to health services.2 Persons who lack a regular source for medical care have less access to primary care2 and are more likely to experience a delay in seeking preventive health care and services4; such persons, therefore, are at greater risk for chronic health conditions. Identification of subgroups at increased risk (i.e., young adults, males, Hispanics, persons with low incomes, and uninsured persons) is important in targeting prevention strategies to ensure greater access to and use of preventive health services. These results suggest that a policy of promoting a regular source of medical care is likely to facilitate access to health-care services for adults. At the state level, information about regular source of medical care can be used to develop policies promoting better access to health-care services, thereby lowering the prevalence of chronic health problems and associated economic costs.
Demographic Characteristics of Persons Without a Regular Source of Medical Care—Selected States, 1995. JAMA. 1998;279(20):1603. doi:10.1001/jama.279.20.1603-JWR0527-3-1