[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
April 15, 2009

Data Errors in Table in: Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines

JAMA. 2009;301(15):1544. doi:10.1001/jama.301.15.1544-a

Data Errors in Table: In the Original Contribution entitled “Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines,” published in the February 25, 2009, issue (2009;301[8]:831-841), Table 1 contains data errors. For “Unstable angina” the row for 2007 should report the following data: Class I, 187/298; Class II, 82/298; and Class III, 29/298. The percentages shown in this row are correct. In the row “Change in No. of recommendations” for disease guidelines, correct numbers are +109 (Class I), +137 (Class II), and +25 (Class III). Near the bottom of Table 1, under “Summary of all guidelines,” the row “Change in No. of recommendations” should report +315 (Class I), +248 (Class II), and +80 (Class III). Also in Table 1, under “Interventional guidelines” the row 2004 for CABG should report the denominator as 84 (not 56). The percentages shown are correct. As a consequence, on page 833 in the first column, the sentence should read, “The raw increase in number of recommendations was higher for disease-based guidelines (271 additional recommendations) and diagnostic procedure–based guidelines (242 additional recommendations) than for interventional procedure–based guidelines (130 additional recommendations).”