[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.90.95. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
June 2, 1999

Impact of Multiple Births on Low Birthweight—Massachusetts, 1989-1996

JAMA. 1999;281(21):1980-1981. doi:10.1001/jama.281.21.1980-JWR0602-2-1

MMWR. 1999;48:289-292

2 tables omitted

In Massachusetts during 1989-1996, perinatal health indicators such as infant mortality, teen birth rate, and maternal smoking during pregnancy decreased steadily; however, low birthweight (LBW) (i.e., <2500 g [<5 lbs, 8 oz]) rates increased consistently.1 During this same period, the multiple-birth rate (i.e., number of twins and higher order multiple births per 100 live births) increased from 2.5% in 1989 to 3.5% in 1996. Massachusetts has the highest multiple-birth rate in the United States.2,3 Multiple births are more likely to result in LBW infants.2 To determine the effect of changes in the rate of multiple births on LBW rates and to characterize women who have multiple births, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health examined data on births in Massachusetts during 1989-1996. This report summarizes the results of this analysis, which indicate that the increase in LBW rates in Massachusetts was associated with changes in the rate of multiple births, especially among older, better educated women.

Data were derived from birth certificates of infants born to women who resided in Massachusetts during 1989-1996. Plurality is classified as singleton, twin, and triplets-plus (i.e., multiple births of three or more infants). Two categories of maternal education were analyzed: high school education or less and four or more years of college. Adjusted LBW rates were calculated by applying the plurality-specific LBW rate in a given year to the plurality distribution in 1989. The adjusted LBW rate can be interpreted as the LBW rate in a given year had the plurality distribution been the same as in 1989. The difference between the adjusted and unadjusted LBW rates indicates the effect of the change in the distribution of plurality on LBW rates.

From 1989 to 1996, the LBW rate for singletons remained constant at 4.8%. However, the proportion of twins increased from 2.4% to 3.3%, and the LBW rate among twins increased slightly from 45.8% to 48.2%. The largest plurality-specific increase in births was among triplets-plus, which increased from 0.1% of all births in 1989 to 0.2% in 1996. The LBW rate for triplets-plus did not change substantially from 1989 through 1996, ranging from 84% to 92%.

The unadjusted LBW rate increased 8% during 1989-1996. However, when LBW rates were adjusted for the increase in multiple births, LBW rates for 1989 and 1996 were the same (5.9%).

In 1989, multiple-birth rates by maternal education level were similar: for women with a high school education or less, the rate was 2.4%, compared with 2.5% for women with four or more years of college. From 1989 to 1996, the proportion of multiple births to women with high school education or less increased from 2.4% to 2.8%, and the proportion of multiple births to women with four or more years of college increased from 2.5% to 4.2%. Among women aged ≥35 years and with four or more years of college, the proportion of multiple births increased from 3.2% to 5.8%. Although the overall number of births in Massachusetts decreased 12% from 1989 to 1996, the number of multiple births increased 24%. Among women aged ≥35 years, the number of multiple births more than doubled. From 1989 through 1996, unadjusted LBW rates for infants born to women aged <35 years with a high school education or less declined slightly from 7.1% to 7.0%; among women aged <35 years with four or more years of college, the LBW rate increased 22%, from 4.1% to 5.0%. Among women aged ≥35 years, LBW rates increased 27% among less educated women (7.8% to 9.8%) and 30% (5.0% to 6.5%) among more educated women.

Reported by:

BB Cohen, DJ Friedman, Z Zhang, EB Trudeau, Bur of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation; DK Walker, M Anderka, S Fogerty, S Franklin, Bur of Family and Community Health, Massachusetts Dept of Public Health. PA McKenna, March of Dimes, Boston, Massachusetts. Div of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

The findings in this report indicate that the increase in the proportion of multiple births is directly responsible for the increase in crude LBW rates in Massachusetts from 1989 to 1996. These findings are consistent with national data that indicate state LBW rates are affected by twin birth rates.4

This analysis highlights two issues. First, although multiple births constitute a small proportion of all live-born infants, the large increase in multiple births substantially influences trends in LBW. Routine birthweight surveillance trend data should be adjusted for, or stratified by, plurality. Second, the characteristics of mothers giving birth to LBW infants changed during this time period. For example, in 1989, 59% of LBW infants in Massachusetts were born to women who had a high school education or less. By 1996, 43% of LBW infants were born to women who had a high school education or less. From 1989 to 1996, the proportion of LBW infants born to women aged >35 years doubled (from 11% to 22%).

The increase in multiple births and LBW rates, particularly among older women, may result from increased use of fertility drugs and assisted reproduction technologies.5 In Massachusetts in 1996, based on new data recorded on Massachusetts birth certificiates, fertility drugs or assisted reproduction technologies were used by 13% of mothers with multiple-birth deliveries, compared with 0.7% of mothers with singleton births. Massachusetts law, which requires insurance companies, health-maintenance organizations, and medical assistance to cover medically necessary expenses of infertility diagnosis and treatment, and the state's aging birthing population may have increased the use of assisted reproduction technologies.6 In addition, better educated women may be more sophisticated users of reproductive assistance and have the financial resources for the additional costs of fertility treatment.

The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, newly collected data on birth certificates about use of fertility drugs and assisted reproduction technologies may be underreported. Second, other factors that may affect change in LBW (e.g., smoking) were not included in this analysis.

The public health implications for targeting services for this emerging LBW infant population and their mothers are substantial. Multiple gestation increases morbidity risks for infants and mothers2,7 and mortality risks for infants.8 Programs such as high-risk infant identification, congenital anomaly surveillance, and delivery of early intervention services must be reevaluated as a result of these changes in the birthing population.

References
1.
Zhang  ZCohen  BBAverbach  AR Advance data births: 1996.  Boston, Massachusetts Bureau of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation, Massachusetts Department of Public Health March1998;
2.
Ventura  SJMartin  JACurtin  SCMathews  TJ Report of final natality statistics, 1996.  Hyattsville, Maryland US Department for Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health StatisticsMonthly vital statistics reports (vol 46, no. 11).
3.
Martin  JAMacDormand  MFMathews  TJ Triplet births: trends and outcomes, 1971-94. Vital Health Stat. 1997;21 (55)
4.
CDC, State-specific variation in rates of twin births—United States, 1992-1994. MMWR. 1997;46121- 5
5.
Wilcox  LSKiely  JLMelvin  CLMartin  MC Assisted reproductive technologies: estimates of their contribution to multiple births and newborn hospital days in the United States. Fertil Steril. 1996;65361- 6
6.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine, State infertility insurance laws. Available at http://www.asrm.org/patient/insur.html. Accessed September 3, 1998.
7.
Keith  LGPapiernick  ELuke  B The costs of multiple pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;36109- 14Article
8.
Kleinman  JCFlower  MGKessel  SS Comparison of infant mortality among twins and singletons: United States, 1986 and 1983. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133133- 43
×