Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
June 6, 2001

Is Medical School the Right Place to Choose a Specialty?

Author Affiliations

Not Available


Copyright 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2001American Medical AssociationThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Not Available

JAMA. 2001;285(21):2782-2783. doi:10.1001/jama.285.21.2782-JMS0606-4-1

The choice of a specialty by the new physician is important on many levels. The student's career satisfaction and personal fulfillment will be affected by the specific attributes of his or her work. Physician satisfaction has been found to be correlated with both patient satisfaction1 and clinical outcomes.2 Society also has an interest in medical student career choices. The efficiency of the US health care system and access to care for urban poor and rural populations depend on the number and ratio of generalist and specialist physicians.3 Unfortunately, the current process of specialty selection by medical students serves neither the student nor society optimally.

Most future physicians make their final specialty choice during the third year and early part of the fourth year of medical school, after only 2 or 3 years of professional socialization.4,5 Choosing a specialty has been described as assessing one's fit with the perceived attributes of potential specialties,6 which might include personality, income, lifestyle, intellectual challenge, technological orientation, clinical skill, geographic options, and potential for research or leadership. Students must accurately understand both their own needs and the characteristics of the specialty they are considering.

For some students, preexisting impressions of their preference for a particular specialty are confirmed, while others may reject early preferences when they acquire new or refined images of specialties or discover some they had not previously considered. Other students may develop a new understanding of themselves that no longer seems compatible with earlier preferences.6,7 Additional predictors of specialty choice may include demographic characteristics,8 aspects of the medical school experience,9 and personality traits.10 For example, an older female student from a small town who attends a publicly funded medical school with a required third-year family medicine clerkship is likely to choose a primary care residency. A younger male from a suburban upbringing who values technology over humanism and attends a privately funded school is more likely to choose a hospital-based specialty.8

These characteristics may predict choice, but may not always lead to goodness of fit. Students are pressed to decide early, usually after only slightly more than a year of brief exposure to specialties in clinical clerkships. Gaining insight into one's aptitudes and professional priorities, especially at a young age, is a difficult task. Guessing how those strengths and needs might evolve over a lifelong career is even more challenging. Some students, despite what they believe to be the best choice of specialty, choose otherwise because of practical barriers such as grades, family preferences, and finances.11

Furthermore, except for those students who will choose an academic career, the image of a specialty may be distorted by the filter of the traditional academic setting.12 This is because most teachers and role models in medical school have careers that are quite different from their more numerous nonacademic counterparts. Clearly, the rewards and pressures are different in community practice and academic medicine. Also, the prevalence and acuity of disease at academic medical centers is different from that in the community. In our university hospital, for example, pituitary surgery and liver transplants are performed more often than appendectomies. This can hardly give an accurate picture of the life of a typical surgeon.

A popular book devoted to familiarizing current and prospective medical students with medical careers advises " . . . when contemplating your choice, familiarize yourself with the common, daily tasks that are a part of the job and ask yourself whether doing them day in and day out will engage you and keep you happy. It may be fun and challenging to repair the weekend athlete's ruptured tendon, but you may find that you cannot stand evaluating low back pain ten times each day."13 Unfortunately, most students do not have the opportunity during the critical third and early fourth years to experience in representative ways the life and work of community-based physicians, be they general surgeons, family physicians, pathologists, or any other specialist.

There is evidence that a more accurate perception of the lifestyle and work of a given specialty can alter the types or numbers of students choosing that specialty. Most of this research has been conducted in family practice. Prospective studies indicate that requiring participation in a third-year family practice clerkship or longitudinal clinical placement increases the likelihood of selecting that specialty.12 In New Mexico, students assigned to a primary care curriculum that included long-term community-based clinical placements beginning in the first year were more likely to retain prior interest in family practice than their colleagues in a traditional curriculum.14

Greater exposure to family practice does not always increase student interest in the specialty. Many students who enter medical school interested in family practice are discouraged by the relatively low prestige of that specialty in the academic environment.15,16 One study concluded that as some students gain a more accurate perception of lifestyle and practice characteristics, their level of preference for family practice declines.17 But whether more knowledge and exposure results in more or fewer students choosing the specialty, it is likely to be beneficial if the chance of a better fit is enhanced. Selection of other specialties has been less well studied, but there is also evidence that the academic medical center distorts images of daily life in specialties other than family practice.18

The stakes for choosing the right specialty are high. Physician dissatisfaction and frustration are common and appear to be increasing.19,20 At least 1 of 3 physicians leaves or changes practice within 5 years of completing training.21 Approximately one quarter of medical school graduates change specialty or make a major career change after graduation.7 Among women physicians, 31% would "maybe, probably, or definitely" decline to enter medicine again if given a second opportunity and 38% would "maybe, probably, or definitely" change their specialty.22 While this is commonly attributed to the stress of practicing under managed care, increasing threat of litigation, and downward salary pressures, it is also possible that some of the dissatisfaction comes from mismatches of physician and specialty that may have their origin in distorted images of the specialty from medical school.23

Students facing tough choices between specialties can benefit greatly from the opportunity to work with physicians outside the academic medical center environment before making their final decision. Individual students should aggressively seek such opportunities, and medical schools should do everything they can to assist them. We believe that renewed consideration should be given to delaying specialty selection for all students, perhaps by returning to a universal internship that could include practice in community settings and rotations in areas such as public health and preventive medicine.

More research on specialty selection increases the likelihood that students will have sufficient information to make the best choice for themselves and society. Meanwhile, providing students with better opportunities to form realistic impressions of their potential future careers would be a good first step.

Haas  JSCook  EFPuopolo  ALBurstin  HRCleary  PDBrennan  TA Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15122- 128Article
Williams  ESKonrad  TRLinzer  M  et al.  Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;371140- 1154Article
Council on Graduate Medical Education, Tenth Report: Physician Distribution and Health Care Challenges in Rural and Inner-City Areas.  Washington, DC Government Printing Office1998;
Kassebaum  DGSzenas  PL Medical students' career indecision and specialty rejection: roads not taken. Acad Med. 1995;70937- 943Article
Babbott  DLevey  GSWeaver  SOKillian  CD Medical student attitudes about internal medicine: a study of US medical school seniors in 1988. Ann Intern Med. 1991;11416- 22Article
Burack  JHIrby  DMCarline  JDAmbrozy  DMEllsbury  KEStritter  FT A study of medical students' specialty-choice pathways: trying on possible selves. Acad Med. 1997;72534- 541Article
Jarecky  RKSchwartz  RWHaley  JVDonnelly  MB Stability of medical specialty selection at the University of Kentucky. Acad Med. 1991;66756- 761Article
Martini  CReloski  JBarzansky  BXu  GFields  S Medical school and student characteristics that influence choosing a generalist career. JAMA. 1994;272661- 668Article
Campos-Outcalt  DSenf  JPust  R Family practice specialty preference before and after a required clerkship. Fam Pract Res J. 1992;12213- 221
Coutts-van Dijk  LCBray  JHMoore  SRogers  J Prospective study of how students' humanism and psychosocial beliefs relate to specialty matching. Acad Med. 1997;721106- 1108Article
Nieman  LZHolbert  DBremer  CCNieman  LJ Specialty career decision making of third-year medical students. Fam Med. 1989;21359- 363
Bland  CJMeurer  LNMaldonado  G Determinants of primary care specialty choice: a non-statistical meta-analysis of the literature. Acad Med. 1995;70620- 641Article
Bernal  DLEpps  CH Vital Signs: Working Doctors Tell the Real Story About Medical School & Practice.  Princeton, NJ Peterson's1994;88
Kaufman  AStewart  MWaterman  R  et al.  The New Mexico experiment: educational innovation and institutional change. Acad Med. 1989;64285- 294Article
Schafer  SShore  WFrench  LTovar  JHughes  SHearst  N Rejecting family practice: why medical students switch to other specialties. Fam Med. 2000;32320- 325
Brearley  WDSimpson  WBaker  RM Family practice as a specialty choice: effect of premedical and medical education. J Med Educ. 1982;57449- 454
Miller  KEFox  BCMitchell  GL Medical students' and private family physicians' perceptions of family practice. Fam Med. 1996;2833- 38
Bauer  RLVenkatachalam  HMForrester  RHHarris  GDDiehl  AK The effect of an ambulatory internal medicine rotation on students' career choices. Acad Med. 1997;72147- 149Article
Linzer  MKonrad  TRDouglas  J  et al.  Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15441- 450Article
Burdi  MDBaker  LC Physicians' perceptions of autonomy and satisfaction in California. Health Aff (Millwood). 1999;18134- 145Article
Willke  RJ Practice mobility among young physicians. Med Care. 1991;29977- 988Article
McMurray  JEWilliams  ESchwartz  MD  et al.  Physician job satisfaction: developing a model using qualitative data. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12711- 714Article
Jennet  PKishinevsky  MBryant  HHunter  KL Major changes in medical careers following medical school graduation. Acad Med. 1990;6548- 49Article