[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
January 27, 2010

Deaths Related to 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Among American Indian/Alaska Natives—12 States, 2009

JAMA. 2010;303(4):323-324. doi:

MMWR. 2009;58:1341-1344

2 tables omitted

Indigenous populations from Australia, Canada, and New Zealand have been found to have a three to eight times higher rate of hospitalization and death associated with infection with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus.1 In October, two U.S. states (Arizona and New Mexico) observed a disproportionate number of deaths related to H1N1 among American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs). These observations, plus incomplete reporting of race/ethnicity at the national level, led to formation of a multidisciplinary workgroup comprised of representatives from 12 state health departments, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, tribal epidemiology centers, the Indian Health Service, and CDC. The workgroup assessed the burden of H1N1 influenza deaths in the AI/AN population by compiling surveillance data from the states and comparing death rates. The results indicated that, during April 15–November 13, AI/ANs in the 12 participating states had an H1N1 mortality rate four times higher than persons in all other racial/ethnic populations combined. Reasons for this disparity in death rates are unknown and need further investigation; however, they might include a high prevalence of chronic health conditions (e.g., diabetes and asthma) among AI/ANs that predisposes them to influenza complications, poverty (e.g., poor living conditions), and delayed access to care. Efforts are needed to increase awareness among AI/ANs and their health-care providers of the potential severity of influenza and current recommendations regarding the timely use of antiviral medications. Efforts to promote the use of 2009 H1N1 influenza monovalent vaccine in AI/AN populations should be expanded.

In November 2009, all state health departments were invited to participate in the workgroup investigation by providing data on influenza-related deaths among their residents. Twelve states (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Michigan, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) chose to participate, representing 50% of the AI/AN population in the United States. An H1N1 death was defined as a death in a resident of a participating state reported during April 15–November 13 with any positive result from an influenza test, including rapid enzyme immunoassay, direct or indirect influenza fluorescent antibody, real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction assay (rRT-PCR), or viral culture. Because >99% of influenza specimens tested during the study period had been found to be H1N1, all cases with a positive influenza test were presumed to be H1N1 and not seasonal influenza. Race/ethnicity and influenza risk status* of decedents were determined through review of death certificates, medical records, or death investigation reports. CDC-defined groups at higher risk for influenza complications were used to classify decedents as at high risk for influenza complications. Bridged-race vintage 2008 postcensal population estimates† were used by all states to determine population data for rate calculations.‡ Death rates by race/ethnicity were age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population. Using rate ratios, AI/AN death rates were compared with death rates for all other racial/ethnic populations, including deaths in persons of unknown race.

A total of 426 H1N1 deaths were reported by the 12 states during April 15–November 13. Forty-two deaths (9.9%) occurred among AI/ANs,§ although AI/ANs make up approximately 3% of the total population in the 12 states. The overall AI/AN H1N1-related death rate was 3.7 per 100,000 population, compared with 0.9 per 100,000 for all other racial/ethnic populations combined,∥ resulting in a mortality rate ratio of 4.0. Age group–specific H1N1-related death rates were 3.5 for persons aged 0-4 years, 1.1 for persons aged 5-24 years, 4.2 for persons aged 25-64 years, and 7.2 for persons aged ≥65 years. In all age groups, the AI/AN death rate was higher than the rate for all other racial/ethnic populations combined.

Among the AI/AN deaths related to H1N1, 81.0% of decedents had high-risk health conditions, compared with 77.6% of persons in all other racial/ethnic populations combined. In addition, greater percentages of AI/AN decedents had asthma (31.0%) and diabetes (45.2%) than decedents in all other racial/ethnic populations combined (14.1% asthma and 24.0% diabetes).

Reported by:

L Castrodale, DVM, J McLaughlin, MD, Alaska Div of Public Health. S Imholte, MPH, K Komatsu, MPH, Arizona Dept of Health Svcs. E Wells, MD, Michigan Dept of Community Health. M Landen, MD, D Selvage, MHS, M Sewell, DrPH, C Smelser, MD, D Thompson, MD, New Mexico Dept of Health. K Bradley, DVM, C McDonald, MPH, Oklahoma State Dept of Health. R Leman, MD, M Powell, MPH, Oregon Dept of Human Svcs. T Miller, MPH, L VanderBusch, North Dakota Dept of Health. L Kightlinger, PhD, South Dakota Dept of Health. R Boulton, MSPH, Utah Dept of Health. K Lofy, MD, AA Marfin, MD, Washington State Dept of Health. R McClinton, MPH, Wyoming Dept of Health. M Hoopes, MPH, Northwest Portland Tribal Epidemiology Center. T Kim, MD, California Tribal Epidemiology Center. JM Hayes, DrPH, Tribal Epidemiology Center, United South and Eastern Tribes. Z Mahal, MBBS, Inter Tribal Council of Arizona Epidemiology Center. E Chao, MPH, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. T Weiser, MD, Portland area; JE Cheek, MD, JT Redd, MD, Div of Epidemiology and Disease Prevention, Indian Health Svc. R Bryan, MD, Office of State and Local Support, Office of the Director; M Jhung, MD, Influenza Div, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; M Morrison, MPH, D O’Leary, DVM, Career Epidemiology Field Officer Program, Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response; M Nichols, DVM, EIS Officer, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

The AI/AN population is culturally diverse and spread among approximately 560 federally recognized tribal communities in 34 states and multiple urban areas.2 Health disparities between the AI/AN population and other racial/ethnic populations are well documented.3 Mortality rates and trends for respiratory diseases indicate that AI/ANs are at increased risk for death resulting from pneumonia and influenza.4,5 Although AI/AN death rates varied among the 12 participating states in this study, the aggregate AI/AN H1N1-related death rate from 12 states was four times higher than that of all other racial/ethnic groups combined.

The higher mortality rate among AI/ANs observed in this investigation is consistent with reports of increased influenza-related morbidity and mortality among indigenous populations in other parts of the world during the current H1N1 pandemic and also is consistent with observations from previous pandemics.1,2 After the influenza pandemic of 1918-19, U.S. government investigators reported that influenza-related mortality rates among AI/ANs were four times higher than the rates observed among persons in general urban populations.2

The factors that produce a higher influenza mortality rate among AI/ANs are unknown but might include higher prevalence of underlying chronic illness such as diabetes. The age-specific prevalence of diabetes in AI/AN adults is two to three times higher than for all U.S. adults.6 In addition, AI/ANs are twice as likely to have unmet medical needs because of cost.7 AI/ANs also have the highest poverty rate (30%), which is twice the national rate and three times the rate for whites among households with children aged <18 years,8 suggesting that delayed access to medical care and living conditions associated with poverty might contribute to their higher influenza mortality rate.

The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, AI/AN decedents often are misclassified as persons of other races on death certificates, decreasing the number of A1/AN deaths by as much as 30% in some reports.9 Second, the time lags in reporting of deaths and the manner in which states collect death data and classify decedents as at high risk for influenza complications might vary and affect rate ratios in an unpredictable manner. Third, race and ethnicity were unknown for 19 deaths, although for a conservative comparison, these deaths were included with the combined group of all other racial/ethnic populations. Fourth, greater incidence of influenza disease among AI/ANs might have contributed to the higher mortality rate; however, the incidence of disease among AI/ANs is unlikely to be so much greater than all other populations that it could account for a mortality rate that is four times higher. Data on race/ethnicity are not collected consistently for influenza patients. Finally, although >99% of all identified influenza strains in the United States during the investigation period were thought to be H1N1, confirmation by rRT-PCR or viral culture was not required for inclusion in this analysis.

Effective public health responses to influenza will depend on accurate and complete reporting of race/ethnicity in all state and federal mortality surveillance systems. Community education regarding the risk for influenza mortality among AI/ANs should be expanded. Increased efforts should be made to promote awareness among AI/ANs and their health-care providers about the signs and symptoms of influenza and recommendations for vaccination and the use of influenza antiviral medications early in the course of suspected influenza illness for those at increased risk for complications. Finally, factors that might contribute to increased influenza-related mortality in the AI/AN population, including the role of underlying chronic medical conditions and social determinants of health, should be topics for future investigation.


This report is based, in part, on contributions by CA Snider, MPH, Oklahoma City Area Tribal Epidemiology Center, and BL Cadwell, MSPH, Career Development Div, Office of Workforce and Career Development, CDC.

What is already known on this topic?

Increased rates of influenza-related morbidity and mortality among indigenous populations in other parts of the world have been reported during the current H1N1 pandemic.

What is added by this report?

This report demonstrates that American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) in the participating 12 states had an H1N1 mortality rate that was four times higher than the rate for all other racial/ethnic groups combined.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Health professionals and agencies should expand community education regarding the risk for influenza mortality, ensure access to and early empiric use of influenza antiviral medication, promote H1N1 vaccination, and investigate factors contributing to a higher influenza-related mortality rate among AI/ANs.

*CDC defined groups at high risk for influenza complications: children aged <2 years; persons aged ≥65 years; pregnant women and women up to 2 weeks postpartum (including after pregnancy loss); persons of any age with certain chronic medical or immunosuppressive conditions (i.e., chronic pulmonary [including asthma], cardiovascular [except hypertension], renal, hepatic, hematologic [including sickle cell disease], or metabolic disorders [including diabetes]); disorders that can compromise respiratory function or the handling of respiratory secretions or that can increase the risk for aspiration (e.g., cognitive dysfunction, spinal cord injuries, seizure disorders, or other neuromuscular disorders); immunosuppression, including that caused by medications or by human immunodeficiency virus; and persons aged <19 years who are receiving long-term aspirin therapy. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm.

†Race bridging is a method used to make multiple-race and single-race data collection systems sufficiently comparable to permit estimation and analysis of race-specific statistics.

‡Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/population.html.

§Alabama (one death), Alaska (two), Arizona (16), Michigan (zero), New Mexico (eight), North Dakota (zero), Oklahoma (three), Oregon (one), South Dakota (four), Utah (two), Washington (four), and Wyoming (one).

∥Death rates per 100,000 population for the other racial/ethnic populations were 1.4 for Hispanics, 1.1 for Asian or Pacific Islanders, 0.8 for whites, and 0.7 for blacks.


10 Available.