[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
May 20, 1998

Incorrect Table Footnote

JAMA. 1998;279(19):1528. doi:10.1001/jama.279.19.1528

In the Original Contribution entitled "Effect of Vitamin E and Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial," published in the March 6, 1996, issue of THE JOURNAL (1996;275:693-698), the authors recently discovered a computing error that affects the size of the study population and has a slight effect on the relative risk (RR) estimates of the 29,133 participants in the Alpha Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study: 23,862 were free of coronary heart disease at baseline, and during follow-up 1920 new cases of angina pectoris were observed. Of these, 930 occurred among α-tocopherol–supplemented subjects and 990 among the non-α-tocopherol–supplemented subjects, with an RR for incident angina pectoris of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.02; P=.15); 980 among the beta carotene–supplemented subjects and 940 among non–beta carotene–supplemented subjects, RR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.96-1.14; P=.34). Compared to those who received placebo, the RR for the incidence of angina was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86-1.11; P=.70) for the α-tocopherol group; 1.09 (95% CI, 0.96-1.23; P=.19) for the beta carotene group; and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86-1.11; P=.73) for the group that received alpha;-tocopherol and beta carotene combined. The original conclusions remain unchanged.