[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Correction
May 27, 1998

Incorrect Wording

JAMA. 1998;279(20):1614. doi:10.1001/jama.279.20.1614

In The Rational Clinical Examination entitled "Does This Patient Have Deep Vein Thrombosis?" published in the April 8, 1998, issue of THE JOURNAL (1998;279:1094-1099), wording in a table was incorrect. On page 1096, in Table 5, the sentence that reads "Scoring method: high probability if ≥3 major points and no alternative diagnosis, ≥2 major points and ≥2 minor points and no alternative diagnosis; low probability if 1 major point and ≥2 minor points and an alternative diagnosis, 1 major point and ≥1 minor point and no alternative diagnosis, 0 major points and ≥3 minor points and an alternative diagnois, 0 major points and ≥2 minor points and no alternative diagnosis; and moderate probability if all other combinations" should have read as follows: "Scoring method: high probability if ≥3 major points and no alternative diagnosis, ≥2 major points and ≥2 minor points and no alternative diagnosis; low probability if 1 major point and ≤2 minor points and an alternative diagnosis, 1 major point and ≤1 minor point and no alternative diagnosis, 0 major points and ≤3 minor points and an alternative diagnosis, 0 major points and ≤2 minor points and no alternative diagnosis; and moderate probability if all other combinations."

×