[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
July 11, 2007

Incorrect Prevalence in: Mandatory HPV Vaccination: Public Health vs Private Wealth

JAMA. 2007;298(2):178. doi:10.1001/jama.298.2.178-a

Incorrect Prevalence: In the Editorial entitled “Mandatory HPV Vaccination: Public Health vs Private Wealth” published in the May 2, 2007, issue of JAMA (2007;297(17):1921-1923), 2 sentences regarding HPV prevalence were inaccurate. On page 1921, in the second paragraph, the second to last sentence should read: “Although infection with high-risk HPV types . . . high-risk types 16 and 18 have a relatively low prevalence (2.3% among screened females),4 and not all women. . . . ” Also on page 1921, second column, the last paragraph on the page should read: “Given that the overall prevalence of HPV vaccine types associated with cervical cancer is relatively low (2.3%). . . . ”