[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Download PDF
Figure 1. Magnetic Resonance Image and Computed Tomography Image of an Ancient Egyptian Mummy
Image description not available.

An ancient Egyptian mummy head, mid-sagittal plane. A, Bright signal of presumed resin (embalming liquid) relative to adjoining prevertebral tissue (yellow arrowheads) in comparison with multislice computed tomography scan image (B). Greater range of signal in the 2 locations of embalming substances, prevertebral and intracranial/occipital (black arrowhead), is visible by magnetic resonance imaging (A) in comparison with computed tomography scan (B). The brain was removed during embalming. MRI technical data: transmit receive knee coil; transverse relaxation time, 20 milliseconds; echo time, 100 microseconds; field of view, 282 mm3; acquisition time, 21.9 minutes.

Figure 2. Magnetic Resonance Image of an Ancient Egyptian Mummy
Image description not available.

Magnetic resonance–based 3-dimensional reconstruction (virtual coronal cut through mid-face) of an ancient Egyptian mummy head. Differences in signal densities of external/internal lamina (yellow arrowheads) vs diploetic bone and the high signal of embalming-related substances in the orbits and the mouth cavity (black arrowheads) are visible. MRI technical data: see Figure 1.

Figure 3. Magnetic Resonance Image of an Ancient Peruvian Mummy
Image description not available.
1.
Aufderheide AC. Progress in soft tissue paleopathology.  JAMA. 2000;284(20):2571-2573PubMedArticle
2.
Rühli FJ, Chhem RK, Böni T. Diagnostic paleoradiology of mummified tissue: interpretation and pitfalls.  Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004;55(4):218-227PubMed
3.
Sebes JI, Langston JW, Gavant ML, Rothschild BM. Magnetic resonance imaging of growth recovery lines in fossil vertebrae.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(2):415-416PubMedArticle
4.
Piepenbrink H, Frahm J, Hanse A. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of mummified corpses.  Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986;70(1):27-28PubMedArticle
5.
Nielles-Vallespin S, Weber M, Bock M.  et al.  3D radial projection technique with ultrashort echo times for sodium MRI: clinical applications in human brain and skeletal muscle.  Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(1):74-81PubMedArticle
6.
Ordidge RJ, Kanal E, Shellock FG. Special issue: MR safety.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12(1):1-204PubMedArticle
Citations 0
Research Letter
December 12, 2007

Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Ancient Dry Human Mummies Without Rehydration

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2007;298(22):2618-2620. doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2618-b

To the Editor: Ancient human mummies are a unique source to study the evolution of disease.1 Noninvasive imaging of such historic tissues is of increasing interest in paleoanthropological and paleopathological studies, with conventional radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan being the standard modalities.2 However, the ability to differentiate soft tissues by CT scan in mummies is limited and the ionizing radiation is of uncertain safety to the samples. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been applied to ancient dry tissues after sample-altering rehydration,3,4 a process deemed necessary due to the lack of unbound protons. We show the ability of standard clinical MRI to visualize historic dry tissues without rehydration by use of a newly available MRI pulse sequence.

Methods

Ancient artificially embalmed Egyptian mummies (1 head, 2 hands, and 1 foot; circa 1500-1100 BCE; private collection of F.R.) and a naturally mummified Peruvian corpse (circa 1100 CE; Museum of History and Ethnography, St Gallen, Switzerland) were examined using a 3-dimensional ultra-short-echo time (UTE) sequence5 on a standard 1.5-T clinical MRI scanner (2562 matrix; 32 768 projections, nonselective radiofrequency pulses of 60 microseconds duration; Magnetom Avanto, Siemens AG Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). The 3-dimensional isotropic original data sets were cropped around the sample and volume rendered on standard Leonardo workstations (Siemens AG Medical Solutions) and by Amira version 4.1 software (ZUSE Institute, Berlin, Germany). Correlative multislice CT imaging of all samples was conducted (Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland).

Results

We analyzed proton density–weighted images (isotropic spatial resolution, 0.8-1.1 mm) of soft tissues, bones, mummification-related wrappings, or embalming materials (Figure 1A and B). All samples showed transverse relaxation times (T2) of approximately 300 microseconds, except 1 mummy hand with a T2 of 1.5 milliseconds. Longitudinal relaxation time (T1) was approximately 5 to 10 milliseconds. The magnetic resonance images generally allowed spatial dry mummy tissue discrimination. Subchondral bone appeared bright in comparison with CT scan, and different bone qualities (cortical vs trabecular) could be assessed (Figure 2). Tissues with a high content of collagen type I such as the anuli fibrosi of the intervertebral disk were visible. Among other visualized structures, arteries and ligaments could be discriminated (Figure 3), as well as bone marrow, meninges, and teeth.

Comment

Magnetic resonance imaging using a UTE sequence and standard clinical hardware may be a suitable modality for noninvasive studies of dry soft tissues in paleoanthropological, paleopathological, or forensic research. Yet radiology of mummified samples should be interpreted cautiously because dehydration changes the imaging properties (density on radiograph and CT scan, hydrogen density and mobility on MRI) of the tissues. The relaxation times of tissue such as mummified muscles and bone are generally very short (<1 millisecond) in comparison with those in vivo (eg, T2 of human calf muscle is approximately 25 milliseconds), which has previously made magnetic resonance–based imaging impossible. However, the UTE sequence allows for imaging of dry tissues with extremely short relaxation times.

Clinical MRI allows for a sustainable approach6 favored for rare historic specimens. Our study suggests that morphological alterations by invasive rehydration of the sample before imaging can now be avoided for dry tissues. This study is limited by evaluation of only 2 specimens, and further research is needed to assess the usefulness of the technique on a broader range of tissues. If this is confirmed, the technique may allow anatomical variations and pathological alterations such as atherosclerotic lesions, intervertebral disk protrusion, or degenerative arthritis to be effectively examined qualitatively as well as quantitatively by spatial proton density distribution. In addition, embalming substances show a large signal variation in the MRI, allowing for improved analysis of chemically diverse materials.

Back to top
Article Information

Access to Data: Dr Böni had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Financial Disclosures: Dr Rühli reports receiving travel fees from Forschungskredit University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, and from Siemens AG Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany. Mr von Waldburg reports receiving salary support and travel fees from Forschungskredit University of Zurich and travel fees from Siemens AG Medical Solutions. Drs Nielles-Vallespin and Speier are employees of Siemens AG Medical Solutions. Dr Böni reports no financial disclosures.

Funding/Support: Salary support, travel fees, examination fees, and computer hardware were provided by Forschungskredit University of Zurich. Travel fees were provided by Siemens AG Medical Solutions. Computer software was provided by Hans-Christian Hege, ZUSE Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Role of the Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Additional Contributions: Georges Bonani, PhD, Institute for Particle Physics ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, was compensated for AMS-C14-dating of specimens. Jürg Hodler, Dr Med, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland, provided uncompensated technical comments and also allowed uncompensated access to technical equipment (CT scan). Peter Groscurth, Dr Med, Institute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, provided long-time nonfinancial general support.

References
1.
Aufderheide AC. Progress in soft tissue paleopathology.  JAMA. 2000;284(20):2571-2573PubMedArticle
2.
Rühli FJ, Chhem RK, Böni T. Diagnostic paleoradiology of mummified tissue: interpretation and pitfalls.  Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004;55(4):218-227PubMed
3.
Sebes JI, Langston JW, Gavant ML, Rothschild BM. Magnetic resonance imaging of growth recovery lines in fossil vertebrae.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(2):415-416PubMedArticle
4.
Piepenbrink H, Frahm J, Hanse A. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of mummified corpses.  Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986;70(1):27-28PubMedArticle
5.
Nielles-Vallespin S, Weber M, Bock M.  et al.  3D radial projection technique with ultrashort echo times for sodium MRI: clinical applications in human brain and skeletal muscle.  Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(1):74-81PubMedArticle
6.
Ordidge RJ, Kanal E, Shellock FG. Special issue: MR safety.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12(1):1-204PubMedArticle
×