[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.5.76. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 1,714
Citations 0
Correction
August 18, 2015

Wording Errors in the Text

JAMA. 2015;314(7):731. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.7697

In the Viewpoint entitled “Innovations of the Americans With Disabilities Act: Confronting Disability Discrimination in Employment” published in the June 9, 2015, issue of JAMA,1 the article should have stated more clearly that the pre–Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) requirements for establishing coverage under the “regarded as” part of the definition are no longer required under the ADAAA. Under the ADAAA, an individual is regarded as having a disability if he or she has been subject to discrimination “because of an actual or perceived physical or mental impairment whether or not the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity.” This article was corrected online.

References
1.
Rothstein  MA.  Innovations of the Americans with Disabilities Act: confronting disability discrimination in employment. JAMA. 2015;313(22):2221-2222.
PubMedArticle
×