[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 2,771
Citations 0
Correction
May 24/31, 2016

Incorrect Data

JAMA. 2016;315(20):2237. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.5850

In the Original Investigation entitled “Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3),” published in the February 23, 2016, issue of JAMA,1 data on page 769 were incorrectly reported. The third sentence in the first paragraph should have read “In comparison, only 64% (95% CI, 62%-67%) of decedents had 2 or more SIRS criteria, whereas 65% of survivors had less than 2 SIRS criteria (95% CI, 64%-65%) (eTable 3 in the Supplement).” This article was corrected online.

References
1.
Seymour  CW, Liu  VX, Iwashyna  TJ,  et al.  Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).  JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774.PubMedArticle
×